Bernanke’s calls versus what actually occurred.

 1) Bernanke’s call = Housing steady to higher

Prior to the sell off in housing Bernanke assures everyone housing prices will be steady to higher, there is no bubble, home prices will be supported by the strength in the economy and “there has never been a national decline in home prices”.

Housing sells off hard

Click here for the Fed housing index chart

Screenshot_716

2) Bernanke’s call = He’s confident home loans are being qualified correctly

Mortgage delinquency rates hit a new historic high

Click here for the Fed mortgage delinquency chart

Screenshot_717

3) Bernanke’s call = He expects consumer spending higher

Consumer spending tanks

Click here for the Fed consumer spending chart

Screenshot_719

4) Bernanke’s call = Personal income will rise

Personal income moves lower

Click here for the Fed disposable income chart

Screenshot_720

5) Bernanke’s call = The economy will be supported in part by a decline in energy prices

Crude oil rallies setting a new all time high

Click here for the Fed crude oil chart

Screenshot_721

6) Bernanke’s call = He sees auto sales moving higher

Auto sales tank and set a new low, Chrysler files for bankruptcy within a year

Click here for the Fed vehicle sales chart

Screenshot_718

7) Bernanke’s call = Home construction (housing starts) improving

Housing starts sink harder and faster than any other period in modern history

Click here for the Fed housing start chart

Screenshot_722

8) Bernanke’s call = Moderate growth in the economy moving forward

Gross Domestic product contracts beyond the worst of analysts expectations

Click here for the Fed Gross Domestic Product chart

Screenshot_723

9) Bernanke’s call = The sub prime mortgage market is healthy and liquid

One year latter over 50 of the largest investment banks fail, declare bankruptcy or are acquired because of illiquid failed mortgages. The US has the highest mortgage delinquency rate on record.

Click here for the failure 50 and counting

Click here for the Fed mortgage delinquency chart

Screenshot_724

10) Across the board Bernanke is wrong on every front.

saupload_Helicopter_20Ben21 Nov 2002 the speech that earned Bernenke the nickname “Helicopter Ben

Deflation: Making Sure “It” Doesn’t Happen Here

This is one of  900+ speeches Bernanke has given where the majority of his calls on the economy have been notoriously bad.

The US is now faced the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.

With his record of failure Washington still allows him craft the largest and most costly “economic stimulus” program in US history enabling him to direct unaudited amounts of money that exceed the US GDP.  

11) Bernanke’s “economic stimulus” engages

The Fed creates trillions to force and hold rates at artificial and historic lows.

Federal debt in red, interest paid in green, Fed purchases of US debt in bright blue

Click here for the Fed chart

screenshot_735

12) Low rates strip savers of over ½ a trillion in interest income annually.

Savers are forced to endure the largest negative rates of return for the longest period in history. This 1/2 trillion is stripped from the free market economy to save the U.S. Treasury the same amount in debt service cost.

Click here for the chart

Screenshot_725

While savers are being striped of over 1/2 a trillion in interest income the Fed creates nearly 8 trillion with keypunch entries from 2007 to 2009 to bail out the same banks that created the crisis. Source CBS, Bloomberg and the freedom of information act, again the Fed created this money with keypunch entries.

13) Bailouts by the numbers video

14) Fed’s Inspector General clueless about 9 trillion?

Rep. Alan Grayson questions the Fed inspector General where $9 trillion dollars went… the fed inspector general elizabeth coleman didn’t have a clue.

15) In 2009 the Fed moves from bailouts to outright purchases of 1.7 trillion of bad loans to bail out the same banks that created them.

Click here for the chart

Screenshot_727

16) Banks gorge on record profits

U.S. Banks never lowered the prime, it has remained unchanged at 3.25% since 2009 locking in the largest gross bank profit margins on borrowing costs for the longest period of time in history.

The 1954-2015 average spread between Fed funds (bank borrowing rate) and prime is 2.00% during economic “stimulus” is has averaged 3.15% or over 150% of the historical average. Not that the Japanese are an act to follow but at least they had the conscience to lower their prime to 1.20%.

If the Fed funds rate rose by 1.00% and the prime remained constant at 3.25% the spread between Fed funds and prime would still be larger than the 1954-2015 historical average of 2.00%

Bank Prime in green, Fed funds in red

Click here for the chart

Screenshot_730

17) Fed Objective

Through the creation of money backed by no tangible asset or income flow the Fed believes the prices of goods and services will rise, with it tax revenue allowing the U.S  to exchange its governmental and bank debt problems for inflation and economic recovery with tax revenue outpacing inflation. Click here for his speech.

One thing Bernanke did not anticipate which had already been proven was the ability of government to out spend monetization and currency devaluation.

18) Once again the US proved the monetization theory wrong

Click here for the Fed chart

Screenshot_742

19) Others follow

3 other countries with world currency status Japan, the European Union and the UK also entered the same monetization race to exchange their debt problems for inflation problems.

With all four world currencies working together they give the impression the 4 world reserve currencies are somewhat stable against each other but not against tangible assets like gold.

The the USD, JPY, EUR and GBP  have been hammered against gold but because they have declined together it appears they are somewhat stable.

At the same time these countries have adopted inflation calculation methods which give give the appearance inflation is contained when in reality it’s 2 to 3 times the reported numbers to justify low rates and contain increases in governmental programs.

Gold tells the true story about coordinated currency devaluation but appears to be the aberration. Click here for more on inflation calculation magic.

Increase in the national debt since the U.S. went off the gold standard = 4,4562%
Increase in the price of gold since the U.S. went off the gold standard = 3,2855%

Click here for the current Fed gold chart

Screenshot_729

19) M1 expands

M1 has expanded, tax tax receipts and home prices have increased with it while the Bureau of Labor and Statics (BLS.gov) did  their  “adjustment magic” to keep official inflation low justifying low rates. The harsh reality is people in the US are working longer now to buy the same goods and services than at the height of the Great Depression in 1933.

Click here for the chart

Screenshot_728

20) Longer Term Results of  Bernanke’s Failed Multi Trillion Dollar Experiment.

Debt to tax receipts have disabled the US from servicing it’s debt, each 1% increase in rates consumes 10% of all tax receipts.

The last time the U.S. raised rates (June 2006)

Federal debt = 8.4 trillion
Tax receipts = 1.40 trillion
US debt as a percentage of GDP = 61%

Current
Federal debt = 18.1 trillion
Tax receipts = 1.8 trillion
US debt as a percentage of GDP = 102%

Should interest rates normalize going back to the 1954-2015 average of 5.10% nearly 50% of all tax receipts will be consumed by debt service cost alone pushing annual budget deficits close to 2 trillion dollars annually.

Click here for the current Fed chart

screenshot_735

21) U.S. debt to personal income

Click here for a current Fed chart

22) Debt to the employed population

Click here for current Fed chart

Screenshot_737

23) Debt to hourly earnings

Click here for current Fed chart

Screenshot_738

24) Foreign held debt to the dollar index

Click here for the chart

Screenshot_731

25) Who’s Picking Up the Tab

U.S. Taxpayers, Savers and their Children are getting a 9+ trillion dollar tab

Bernanke’s failed “economic stimulus experiment”  has increased the employed population’s per capita share of the national debt increasing from 67K to over 130K.  If rates return to the 1954-2015 historical average of 5.10% debt service cost per employed U.S. worker will be $6,732 annually.  

26) On deck

The US has 6 Trillion of U.S. debt that is currently owned by non U.S. investors, trillions more in stocks, muni and corporate bonds, currency risk in one day for these non US investors is more than annual yields/dividends.

Click here for the chart

Screenshot_732

27) The dollar is coming off a 10 year high  and looking heavy

The Fed U.S dollar index since March 2015 has sold off from 93.10 to 87.58 or -8.077% for a loss of 526 billion on the 6 trillion owned in just US Treasury debt, 10’s of billions more on share, muni and corporate debt positions.

Click here for the chart

Screenshot_733

28) China’s currency is on deck to become the 5th world reserve currency.

U.S. versus China’s growth, U.S. in blue, China in red

1) Click here for a current Fed chart

Screenshot_734

Click here for more Fed charts comparing China to the US.

29) Contagion exposure isn’t Greece

The move generated by the Greece June 29th and 30th does not represent “contagion” but should be a warning to all. The DAX -3.7%, FTSE -2.1%, CAC -3.8%, S&P -1.2% DOW -1.33%.

The European Union has a GDP of 18.5 trillion (USD) Greece is 242 billion representing less than 2% of the European Union’s total GDP.

To put this into perspective Greece’s GDP is just a little larger than the state of Louisiana (216 billion),

California’s GDP is 2.3 trillion and just think of how many times the State of California has nearly gone broke,

Orange county California’s GDP is 210 billion and was forced to file for bankruptcy in 1994.

If Greece on June 29th and 30th can create this DAX -3.7%, FTSE -2.1%, CAC -3.8%, S&P -1.2% DOW -1.33% just think of the damage and “global contagion” that will engage when sales of 6 trillion or foreign held  U.S debt engages.

The harsh reality for the U.S. and other western economies is there monetary policy is unsustainable, and now irreversible because of prewar Germany/Bernanke style “economic stimulus”  their only out now is currency devaluation and inflation, click here for the numbers and links to Fed charts

30) How this will unwind

1) As the dollar loses credibility foreign sales of U.S. debt, shares and dollar’s will engage
2) These sales will e
scalate as U.S. rates rise rise and Treasury instrument valuations fall
3) Higher rates will hurt U.S. companies resulting in U.S. stock sales
4) China’s currency comes on board as the 5th world reserve currency in October

The U.S. markets will hemorrhage, true contagion will spread to the European Union if is does not occur first in the EU giving the Fed the justification to fire up the “Quantitative Easing” printing press with a vengeance.

31) High true inflation will engage

Total debt service cost in 2014 = $430.81 billion. Average 2014 interest rate = 2.37%

Click here for a current table

Screenshot_396

32) The majority of all U.S. debt is now fixed in durations of 10+ years

Average yield on this debt is 2.37%, (1954-2015 Average 5.10%)

The U.S. has the worst economic fundamentals in it’s history
The U.S. has locked in fixed financing at 2.37% less than half the 1954-2015 average treasury yield of 5.10%

By keeping short term rates near zero those that needed any income were “sucked” into the longer dated U.S. Treasuries allowing the U.S. Treasury to lock in its debt service cost at the lowest rates in history for the longest average duration in history.

This will allow the U.S. to massively devalue the dollar with little or no impact on debt service cost as dollar devaluation and inflation engages.

The same investors who have endured the largest negative rates of return for the longest period in history now face the largest dollar and instrument devaluation in history.

Click here for current quotes

Screenshot_399

33) Further Monetization now remains the only solution (devalue the dollar) 

Pre Monetization interest rate risk to U.S. budget deficits

Had the U.S not “fixed” it’s debt for the next 10+ years the coming interest rate hikes could be catastrophic.

The 2008-2014 average U.S. federal deficit was 1.4506 trillion or greater then the total national debt in 1984 of 1.4107 trillion.

Yellow = current treasury rate with debt service consuming -23.41% of total tax receipts
Red = 1954-2015 average Treasury rate with debt service consuming -50.28% of tax receipts
Orange what rates would be using BLS.GOV calculations from 1980, -92.88% of tax receipts

Screenshot_403

34) Through the creation of money backed by nothing “Quantitative Easing” increases money supply.

As more money chases after the same goods and services prices rise (inflation).

When prices rise so does tax revenue which I believe is the Fed’s ultimate goal, to have the same debt service cost from the fixed rate with potentially twice the revenue to service it.

The Fed chart below shows the direct correlation between M1 (money supply) in black and tax receipts in green.

Click here for a current Fed chart

Screenshot_401

35) Post Monetization (after the Fed devalues the dollar against tangible assets)

U.S. Treasury debt is fixed for greater than 10 years the impact on debt service cost will be minimal with the increase in inflated tax revenue offsetting the increase in rates.

Yellow = current treasury rate with debt service consuming -11.71% of tax receipts
Red = 1954-2015 average Treasury rate with debt service consuming -25.14% of tax receipts
Orange what rates would be using BLS.GOV calculations from 1980, -46.44% of tax receipts

Screenshot_402

One thing no one can question is the great recession has generated extreme economic fundamentals.

Extreme economic fundamentals generate trends and the kind of markets and profit potential traders like myself dream about.

Send a message


Disclosure

 

How China’s race to reserve currency status will rock markets

The inclusion of the Chinese renminbi into the basket of IMF’s reserve currencies will radically transform global markets and developing countries’ central banks policies.

201That’s according to Ashmore’s head of research Jan Dehn, who shared his views during a press roundtable on Tuesday.

Dehn believes China, which underwent a market correction over the past 10 days, is planning to attract long-term institutional investors, including foreign central banks, into its domestic market.

This is why labelling the renminbi a global reserve currency is crucial – it means that central banks, and not just short-term retail investors, will be buying the currency.

‘97% of all global reserve currencies are in Japanese yen, euro, British pound and US dollar. All these four central banks are currently printing money to stimulate their economy. This means that the world will be soon in serious shortage of global reserve currencies,’ he said.

Dehn thinks China is actively and aggressively responding to this major trend initiated by developed markets, which is likely to cause an appreciation of the renminbi.

‘China knows it sits on a time bomb. Developed markets are trying to find their way out the crisis by creating inflation and weakening their currencies rather than implementing structural reforms. This is going to make the renmimbi appreciate to an unsustainable level.’

The Chinese authorities’ plan is therefore to make international investors tap into its currency as soon as there is a more pronounced shift away from QE-driven currencies, according to Dehn.

A new sovereign wealth fund

Dehn said China would no longer need its foreign exchange reserves once its reaches global reserve status. He compared it to the US, which currently has hardly any foreign exchange reserves.

‘This means that China’s foreign exchange reserves, nearly $4 trillion, will become a sovereign wealth fund, which is not going to be invested in US dollar, but in global infrastructure, private equity and alternatives.’

‘It’s therefore very likely that China, over the next few years, may become a steady seller of US treasuries and buying other assets,’ he added.

‘Going forward, this will be a much larger investment programme involving sovereign wealth fund-type activities all over the emerging world. Other EM central banks such as Mexico’s and India’s will be looking very closely at what China is doing and trying to join the global reserve currency club.’

Financial big bang

Looking at Chinese fixed income, Dehn thinks the municipal bonds market is the most exciting part of the sector at the moment. He highlighted that currently China has 11 trillion RMB ($1.77 trillion) of local government debt, mainly on banks’ balance sheets.

This debt has been swapped into tradable bonds in order to transmit monetary policy signals down to local government level and manage the country’s macro economy.

‘Next step is to stimulate consumption – China has a savings rate of 49%, which represents a great room to increase spending. They will have to reduce people’s precautionary savings putting bonds into their portfolios as at the moment they can just invest in property and stocks,’ he said.

Increased consumption, Dehn argued, will drive imports and worsens the country’s account surplus. ‘The country is opening its domestic market to foreign investors to offset this trend. The market cap of the equity and bond market in China is $15 trillion, which almost equals US GDP.’

‘This is the biggest big bang in world’s economic history – never has a market the scale of the US economy been opened to international investors.’

x

Click here for contact details

Expectations for today’s FOMC June policy meeting –

The following are the expectations for today’s FOMC June policy meeting as provided by the economists at 22 major banks along with some thoughts on the USD into the event as provided by the FX strategists at these banks.

Goldman: The overarching message from the meeting will probably be that September remains the Committee’s baseline expectation for the start of monetary tightening, reflecting cumulative progress in the recovery over the last six years. While September remains our baseline as well, we think that the FOMC will want to preserve optionality at the June meeting, and there is still a significant probability that the hiking cycle will not begin until December or later. We expect the content of the Summary of Economic Projections (SEP)—released coincident with the FOMC statement—to be updated to reflect the recent economic data. The unemployment rate path will likely be slightly higher in the near term, while long-term views on the natural rate of unemployment may come down further. Participants’ assessment of the inflation outlook will probably be little changed. Most importantly, we think that both the median and modal “dot” will remain at 0.625% for 2015, consistent with two twenty five basis point hikes this year (beginning in September). However, most other aspects of the dot plot will probably show a dovish shift, reflecting softer H1 activity and the Fed’s “data dependent” mantra.

Barclays: Markets will pay close attention to the tone of the FOMC statement on Wednesday and watch for hints on the timing of the first rate hike. Given the recent pickup in US consumption and labor market data, we think the Fed is likely to maintain its view that the winter slowdown was transitory and that the economy is likely to expand at a moderate pace. Indeed, the pace of job growth has picked up, with payrolls rising 280K in May, and the Fed’s LMCI has increased since the April meeting. Additionally, we expect the Fed to reiterate that inflation will gradually rise toward the 2% target in the medium term as the labor market continues to improve and inflation expectations remain stable. Indeed, CPI data on Thursday, along with the latest import price data, should support our view that downward pressures on domestic core inflation from the lagged effects of USD appreciation will begin to wane going into the third quarter. As such, we continue to think the Fed is on track to hike twice this year (at the September and December meetings). Overall, we believe that the FOMC statements, along with CPI and other macro data, should support the USD

UBS: We expect Chair Yellen to continue setting the stage for the start of the Fed’s tightening cycle later this year. If market expectations are correct, the June FOMC meeting will be the last quarterly update to the FOMC’s forecasts before the Fed at the September 16-17 FOMC meeting hikes rates for the first time in more than nine years. (The previous rate hike was on June 29, 2006.) As a consequence market participants are focused on the upcoming meeting despite no expectation that the Fed funds target rate will be immediately increased. We do not expect the post-meeting statement, the forecast or the press conference to prompt a rethinking of current market expectations. As of Friday the markets were pricing in a bit more than 75% chance of a rate hike at the September FOMC meeting. We believe the FOMC is currently comfortable with that view and is cognizant of the fact that there are ample opportunities to reset market expectations, if needed, before the September meeting.

Deutsche Bank: The statement should have a more positive tone, especially regarding the labor market. Our forecasts of the Fed’s central tendencies are shown in the table below. Despite a reduction in 2015 GDP, we do not believe the median 2015 fed funds dot will change. Any reduction in the median 2015 dot would immediately focus market participants’ collective attention on the December meeting, and the Fed surely wants the option to hike in September, data permitting…Regarding the press conference, Yellen will reaffirm the case for beginning the process of policy normalization sometime later this year. The Fed Chair’s May 22 speech was telling in that she subtly shifted the conversation from outlining why the Fed may begin raising interest rates to how far and how fast they may go after liftoff. She may choose to elaborate on some of the themes of that speech, including productivity growth. In short, we expect the Fed Chair to continue to de-emphasize the timing of liftoff and focus financial market participants on the factors the Fed will be taking into account in determining the pace of policy normalization.

BNP Paribas: We expect today’s FOMC statement to acknowledge improvement in key data after transitory factors suppressing Q1 activity abated. In the subsequent press conference, Chair Yellen will likely continue to emphasize that rate hikes are likely coming at some point later this year. However, the meeting may not provide a decisive catalyst for the US currency. Our economists note that the FOMC’s projection ‘dots’ are likely to shift in a dovish direction as the more hawkish members acknowledge that tightening will not begin in mid-2015. The Committee and Chair Yellen will also need to explain its decision to leave rates unchanged now and be sure to avoid signalling lift off at the July meeting. Rate markets remain underpriced relative to our expectation for tightening to begin in September but we may need to wait for more economic data and subsequent Fed communications before we see an adjustment to our view

Credit Suisse: We expect the FOMC to acknowledge the improvement in US economic statistics since the reported contraction in 1Q. But the rebound in activity is still building momentum and has not been sufficiently conclusive, in our view, to prompt the Fed to tighten policy as soon as this month. Also, while we do assign a small positive probability to a July rate hike, say 15%, we believe September to be the most likely date for policy lift-off. Various scenarios related to the June 16–17 meeting include the possibility of more explicit guidance in the policy statement on the timing of a rate hike (not likely in our view) and downward revisions to GDP growth forecasts.

Nomura: The FOMC is likely to clearly keep September lift-off on the table when it meets this week. After better data momentum, the text of the statement is likely to sound more confident, and the dots are likely to signal that a two-hike scenario in 2015 is still the central case. While one hike has again become the central case, a two-hike scenario is still priced with a fairly low probability. We think the two-hike scenario is around 60% probability, and if this is true, the short end has more room to sell off.

SocGen: The risk at this evening’s FOMC meeting is, that while the underlying economic vies are reasonably upbeat and consistent with ‘lift-off’ happening in September, the (in)famous ‘dot-path’ will be lowered enough to be the main talking point. The FOMC ‘dots’ project 2 rate hikes this year and 5 next, so a total of 1.75% in hikes by the end of 2016. The Fed Funds futures price a 1% rise in rates over the same period, and our economics team expects the dot-plot to be cut back to 125bp. Is the market going to see this as a non-event, affirmation that too little is priced in, or a dovish signal? I rather fear the last of these may win the day but all will be clearer at 19:00 BST or, more likely after 19:30 when the press conference allows Janet Yellen to send the signal she wants. Either way, the bigger move is more likely to come in July/August as data convince people that a hike is coming

Credit Agricole: We expect no changes to rates at the June FOMC meeting and continue to expect rate normalization to begin in September. No rate hikes are expected as policymakers continue to assess progress towards conditions conducive for lift-off. These include (1) continued improvement in labour market conditions and (2) reasonable confidence that inflation will move back to its 2% objective over the medium term. We believe the Fed is close to meeting its employment mandate. However, the Fed is likely to require more evidence before being reasonably confident that inflation will rise towards its 2% objective over the medium term. Assessing the transitory impacts on growth and the economy’s underlying momentum will require more time. However, we believe that the FOMC will see evidence that the conditions for lift-off have been met by the September FOMC meeting. The updated Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) will likely lower GDP growth projections for 2015 in light of the Q1 GDP contraction. We believe most Fed officials expect to begin hiking rates this year. The year-end 2016 median fed funds rate projection may come in slightly below the March projection, in line with the gradual pace of anticipated rate normalisation.

ANZ: Market focus will turn to the FOMC meeting this week and there are three areas to watch for the USD. The first is any commentary on the USD – there has been an increase in official rhetoric about the strength of the USD negatively impacting on the US of late, and this is important for the medium-term USD path. The second is economic growth projections. The market and ANZ expects the Q1 GDP weakness to lead to official 2015 growth forecasts revised lower. The final area to focus on is the ‘dot points’.

RBS: The key hawkish risk at this week’s June FOMC meeting may come from the signaling language. The April meeting minutes revealed that the Fed discussed (and opted not to) give a broader signal that rate hikes were coming soon – any direct step to “prepare” the market for a rate hike via the press conference or statement language would likely be a USD positive. With only 6-months to go before year-end, the market may put focus on the near-term FOMC “dot” projections released this week, where the median currently suggests the Fed can hike twice before year-end. No change in the dot point projections for 2015 could be seen as a positive as only one hike is priced in for the remainder of the year. The well-telegraphed sluggish start to the economy may result in a downward revision to 2015 growth forecasts, and that may leave risks to the “dot point” Fed Funds rate projections as moderately to the downside. Even so, we think the Fed sending a message about increased confidence in their positive outlook may overshadow a revised growth profile.

Lloyds: While a hike in interest rates at today’s FOMC meeting looks highly unlikely, the meeting could still provide clues about the timing of a first move. An important indication of the likelihood of a relatively early rise in rates will be the extent to which the post-meeting statement is more upbeat about recent economic developments compared to the last meeting in April. Markets will also look for hints from Chair Yellen’s post-meeting press conference for the timing of lift-off. However, the Committee will probably be reluctant to add anything to previous comments that any move will be “data dependent”. Finally, the updates to FOMC participants’ interest rate forecasts (the ‘dot plot’) will show whether most still expect interest rates to rise this year, and their expected path over both the short and longer term.

Standard Chartered: Buoyed by improving data (including May payrolls and retail sales data), and by tentative signs of a pick­up in wages, we think the Fed will indicate that the first rate hike is getting closer, supporting our long­held view that the Fed will move in September. We see some pushback on the IMF’s suggestion to wait until 2016 due to risks of increased volatility “in the US and abroad”. This said, we think Yellen will emphasise that the subsequent tightening path will remain very gradual, highlighting that the first steps represent removal of excessive accommodation, not tightening of policy. This is likely to be echoed by falling ‘dots’, which may move closer to (but still not match) the current market pricing, particularly further down the curve. We see the ‘terminal rate’ median moving down by c.25bps as the Fed reduces its assessment of potential growth and productivity. We think the overall tone of the statement and Yellen’s comments will cause the short end to bring forward its rate­hike expectations. Indeed, we expect the median end­2015 ‘dots’ to remain at 0.625%, implying two hikes by year­end. However, the further decline in the longer­term median ‘dots’ that we expect, along with another decline in the Fed’s projection for potential growth, should keep the 10Y sector relatively protected.

Westpac: We expect the FOMC to reinforce our expectation of a Sep funds rate hike (from 0-0.25% to 0.25-0.5%), though of course Chair Yellen should stress ongoing data dependence. The release of quarterly forecasts by FOMC members plus the Yellen press conference 30 minutes later means markets will have plenty to absorb, with volatile trade likely. Given the dismal Q1 GDP report, forecasts for 2015 should be cut notably, with 2016 expectations probably lowered too. Inflation forecasts could also be nudged a little lower.
However, the general tone of the statement and Yellen’s press conference should be positive, with evidence on jobs, retail sales and housing pointing to a rebound in growth in Q2, setting up for solid expansion in H2. The “dot plot” of expectations for the funds rate by end-2015 should consolidate around 50bp of tightening this year, more than priced in. Combined with the press conference, this should see USD emerge firmer from the meeting.

Citi: FOMC unlikely to support USD or rates this time around. The market pivots for FOMC are: 1) How on track the Fed sees the US economy for liftoff and how concretely they signal a September liftoff 2) The 2015 dots are likely to show a big shift down – their problem is that it is difficult to convey neutral, which is 1 hike likely, 2 possible, but no commitment unless data turn out right. We go into this seeing the Fed as leaning to dovish, and hence somewhat USD negative. They do have not much incentive to sound concrete about a September hike this far in advance and would not want asset market reaction in advance of an anticipated September hike to derail an actual September hike. Both their commentary and the dots shifts are likely to be less committal to a hike than the market now expects.

ING: We see this week’s June FOMC as crucial in shifting the focus for markets back to short-term US rates and the theme of monetary policy divergence. Market pricing for the timing of a Fed lift-off has been moving in the right direction, with the probability of a 25bp rate hike in September increasing from 35% to 55% following the robust NFP and retail sales prints. The anomaly of EUR/USD moving higher last week may insinuate pent-up USD strength and we see scope for a sharp move lower once the pair’s relationship with short-term rates normalises.

SEB: We do not expect a rate hike at this meeting. No major changes to June statement are excepted although the fact on recent pick up in data should be noted. The Fed’s new forecasts will also be key focus. The downward revision to its growth outlook will suggest that the pace of rate hikes to be more gradual. In the press conference the market will look for if Yellen’s comments carefully paves the way for a September rate hike. Moreover, what is her take on the international developments (for example the situation in Greece)?

Danske: The updated ‘dots’ will attract a lot of attention and we believe that several members have lowered their expected path for the Fed funds rate. In terms of the statement we expect the tone to be slightly more upbeat than in April given the latest more positive run of US data but we do not expect any major changes in the forward-looking part of the statement. At the following press conference key will be the FOMC view on how much of the Q1 economic weakness is likely to be temporary and how this, combined with the most recent more positive data, has affected its economic outlook.

BTMU: The overall message from Fed Chair Yellen is likely to be that the Fed remains on course to begin raising rates later this year if the economy performs as expected, although the exact timing of the first rate hike is likely to remain unclear. She is also likely to reinforce the message that the expected pace of tightening is expected to be gradual. For the interest rate market the message from the Fed is unlikely to be a big surprise which is already discounting a more dovish outlook for Fed policy. The updated Fed projections will merely move their thinking further into line with the interest rate market. The US dollar may weaken modestly initially if the Fed funds rate and growth projections are lowered. However, the US dollar already appears to trading on the weaker side of yield spreads heading into the FOMC meeting which should help limit further downside potential. Incoming economic data will remain important in determining the outlook for Fed policy and US dollar direction. If the recent improving momentum in the US economy and strengthening wage growth is sustained it is likely to make the Fed more comfortable about raising rates which may still be delivered as early September. In these circumstances, we expect that any US dollar weakness following the FOMC meeting will likely prove short-lived.

CIBC: The Fed will likely sound more confident that the first quarter slowdown was indeed “transitory”, although the updated “dot plot” projections for interest rates have a greater chance of moving markets if they differ materially from March.

BofA Merrill: This week’s FOMC meeting will be pivotal, but not because a rate hike is likely. Indeed, the rates market sees a near-zero probability of a hike in June, despite Friday’s strong employment report (Chart of the day). The July meeting is expected to be a non-event as well, with just 2.5bp of slope priced into the inter-meeting forward OIS curve. Unsurprisingly, the market is treating September as the first truly “live” meeting. Market-implied odds of a September liftoff have increased somewhat over the past few weeks as data have improved, but with 10bp currently priced in, the market remains unconvinced a September hike is likely. This likely reflects lingering uncertainty about the prospects for a growth rebound after a disappointing start to the year. However, our 2Q GDP tracking model now stands at 2.9%, as Ethan Harris notes in his latest Ethanomics. With growth picking up, September remains our base case for the first Fed hike, a view that was affirmed by the latest employment report. In light of this, we reiterate our Aug-Oct 2015 forward OIS curve steepener recommendation (11 bp), which we continue to see as a cheap way to position for a September rate hike.

NAB: the Fed will release its new set of growth, inflation and unemployment forecasts and its “dot point” FOMC member forecasts for the Fed funds rate. No one expects any change in the Fed funds rate, though markets remain priced toward Fed rate lift-off later this year. NAB’s core view remains for Fed Funds rate lift-off will be announced at the 18 September FOMC, with clearer evidence of returning US economic growth and thus confidence in the Fed reaching its 2% PCE inflation target. The FX and bond market will be paying close attention to the Fed Policy Statement, to what Fed Chair Yellen has to say in her press conference, and new US economy forecasts, with particular forecasts on those dot point estimates of the Fed funds rate for the end of 2015, 2016 and 2017. The previous median of the dot points at the March 18 FOMC (its most recent set of forecasts) had a median Fed funds forecast of 50-75 bps for the end of 2015 and 1.75-2% for the end of 2016. The US market at the end of last week was 53% priced for a September 18 lift-off. If the Fed hangs tough and hold to its median Fed Funds forecast for end 2015, that would be supportive of short-term US yields and we expect the USD.

Capturing the first leg higher in interest rates –

Below is a 10K aggressive strategy to capture the first leg higher in interest rates.
Click here for 5k less aggressive position, click here for currency program updates.

1) Maximum risk = -$7,938 between now and March 31, 2016
2) Net profit at our objective = +78,521

3) Trading this rates higher requires a short position.
4) To convert contract price into rate it represents take 100.00contract price = rate
xxEach 0.01 change = $41.67 per contract

5) Click here to enlarge the chart below

6) Click here for the Federal Reserve meeting schedule
7)
Click here for the last tightening cycle 2004-2006 from 1.25% to 5.25%.

8) Click here to open an account.

To experiment with any potential outcome for this trade

9)   Click here and open the March 2016 10K risk reward spreadsheet (aggressive hedged)
10) Click here for March 2016 (ZQH16) quotes

11) Enter any price in cell B-2
12) The rate the contract price represents shows in C-2
13) Net profit/loss E-2
14) Position liquidation value F-2

15) Maximum loss if the Fed funds rate goes to -1.00% and stays there (-$7,937.50)

Screenshot_657

16) Net gain at our profit objective +$78,520.90

Screenshot_658

Support

17) What the Fed funds rate is and how it’s set
18) Click here for videos of where the Fed sees rates and when
19) Click here and  here for media stories
20) We have 7 Fed meetings to determine U.S. rates between now and March 31, 2016

State of affairs

21) U.S. economy by the numbers
22) China’s economy by the numbers & World currency status
23) Where the Fed sees rates, when and what the move is worth
24) Real & Rand Carry trades

Additional reports and programs are available for any major market on the following exchanges.

25) US CME
26) Eurex

27) Euronext
28) Osaka 

29) My team can establish and monitor all positions according to your criteria

30) Our Structure

Fees
Front load = 0.00%
Management fee 0.00%
Inventive Fee = 10.00% of net new high profits quarterly

To open a test account

31) Direct FX opening instructions
32) The world’s largest dollar volume exchange group
33) CME videos
34) Due Diligence and how funds are protected
35) Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Accounts can be funded and maintained in any major currency.
Liquidity in portion or all is 2-48 hours in any major currency.

If you have questions or would like additional information please call with this page available.

x

Click here for contact details

 

——————————————————————————————————————-

RISK DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

PAST RESULTS ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.

EXAMPLES OF HISTORIC PRICE MOVES OR EXTREME MARKET CONDITIONS ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY THAT SUCH MOVES OR CONDITIONS ARE COMMON OCCURRENCES OR ARE LIKELY TO OCCUR. HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM. ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.

THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADE PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.

BID/ASK SPREADS, BROKERAGE COMMISSION, CLEARING, EXCHANGE AND REGULATORY FEES WILL HAVE AN ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE NET OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF YOUR ACCOUNT. PRIOR TO MAKING A DECISION TO PARTICIPATE IN ANY INVESTMENT MAKE SURE YOU FULLY UNDERSTAND THE FEES ASSOCIATED WITH TRADING.

THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT CONTAINS RESEARCH, MARKET COMMENTARY AND TRADE RECOMMENDATIONS. YOU MAY BE SOLICITED FOR AN ACCOUNT BY ONE OF OUR REPRESENTATIVES OR EMPLOYEES. IT SHOULD BE KNOWN THAT THE REPRESENTATIVES OF ANY FIRM MAY TRADE FUTURES AND OPTIONS FOR THEIR OWN ACCOUNTS OR THOSE OF OTHERS. DUE TO VARIOUS FACTORS (SUCH AS MARGIN REQUIREMENTS, RISK FACTORS, TRADING OBJECTIVES, TRADING INSTRUCTIONS, TRADING STRATEGIES, AND OTHER FACTORS) SUCH TRADING MAY RESULT IN THE LIQUIDATION OR INITIATION OF FUTURES OR OPTIONS POSITIONS MAY DIFFER FROM THE OPINIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOUND IN THIS REPORT.

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE PERFORMANCE. THE RISK OF LOSS IN DERIVATIVE CONTRACTS CAN BE SUBSTANTIAL THEREFORE INVESTORS SHOULD UNDERSTAND THE RISKS INVOLVED IN TAKING ANY LEVERAGED POSITION AND MUST BE IN A POSITION ASSUME LOSS FOR THE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH SUCH INVESTMENTS AND FOR TRADE RESULTS.

PLEASE CAREFULLY CONSIDER WHETHER SUCH TRADING IS SUITABLE FOR YOU IN LIGHT OF YOUR CIRCUMSTANCES AND RESOURCES.

Trading short term rates higher –

1) Maximum risk on this trade = -$3,467 through 31 March 2016
2) Net profit at our objective = +35,283
3) Minimum deposit per position 5K or major currency equivalent

Trading rates higher requires a short position
To convert price into rate it represents take 100.00 contract price = rate
Each 0.01 change in contract price = $41.67
What the Fed funds rate is and how it’s set

Click here to enlarge the rate, contract price, contract valuation chart below

Screenshot_751

To experiment with any potential outcome for this trade

4) Click here and open the March 2016 risk reward spreadsheet (hedged)
5) Click here for March 2016 (ZQH16) quotes
6) Enter any contract price in cell B-2
7) The rate the contract price represents shows in C-2
8) Net profit/loss E-2
9) Position liquidation value F-2

10) Maximum loss if the Fed funds rate goes to zero and stays there = -$3,467

Screenshot_753

11) Net gain at our profit objective = +35,283

Screenshot_754

Support links

12) Click here for videos of where the Federal Reserve sees rates and when.
13) Click here and here for 400+ reports on where the market/media expect rates and when.
14) Cick here for the Federal Reserve’s meeting schedule & corresponding closing statements.

State of affairs

15) U.S. economy by the numbers
16) China’s economy by the numbers & World currency status
17) Where the Fed sees rates, when and what the move is worth
18) Bernanke’s calls prior to the “great recession”

Additional reports are available for any major market on the following exchanges.

19) US CME
20) Eurex
21) Euronext
22) Osaka 2

—————————————————————-

Privacy Notice

Disclosure

 

RISK DISCLOSURE –

 

The risk of loss in trading foreign exchange can be substantial. You should therefore carefully consider whether such trading is suitable in light of your financial condition. You may sustain a total loss of funds and any additional funds that you deposit with your broker to maintain a position in the foreign exchange market. Actual past performance is no guarantee of future results. Simulated performance results also have certain limitations unlike actual performance records, simulated results do not represent composite trading. Also, since trades have not actually been executed for this composite, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity, simulated trading results, in general are also subject to the fact they are designed with the benefit of hindsight. No representation can or is being made that any trading system will, or is likely, to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown in this simulated performance record.

The performance records have been calculated in a manner we believe to be reasonable and is based on the respective leverage factors intended to be used. Prospective investors must recognize that any simulation of a hypothetical record, even when based on actual trading systems, with qualified trade execution, has inherent limitations. We believe that the records as presented should be of interest to investors in determining whether to participate, such rates of return should by no means be taken as an indication of how the system will perform or would have performed, even given the same trades. Any performance record compiled from individual performance records of any trading methodologies has certain hypothetical and artificial characteristics and must be evaluated accordingly.

The risk of loss in trading commodities can be substantial.You should therefore carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your financial condition. The high degree of leverage that is often obtainable in commodity trading can work against you as well as for you. The use of leverage can lead to large losses as well as gains.In some cases, managed commodity accounts are subject to substantial charges for management and advisory fees. It may be necessary for those accounts that are subject to these charges to make substantial trading profits to avoid depletion or exhaustion of their assets. The disclosure document of a commodity trading advisor (“CTA”) contains a complete description of the principal risk factors and each fee to be charged to your account by the CTA.

HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM. ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.

What capturing the long term move higher in rates is worth

Trading rates higher requires a short position.

1) Click here to enlarge the valuation chart below, here for current quotes.

Screenshot_449

2)  Click here for where the Fed sees rates & when

3) To convert contract price into rate it represents take 100.00 – contract price = rate
4) Current Fed funds contract price 99.55 (ZQH16), rate 0.45%, value = $1,875
5) Each 0.01 change is price = $41.67 (up = -$41.67, down +$41.67)
6) Contract price at the September 2013 low 98.60, rate 1.60%, value = $6,667

To experiment with any potential outcome for this trade

7)  Click here and open the March 2016 risk reward spreadsheet (no hedge)

Enter any contract price into cell B-2
Net profit or loss will show in cell E-2
Liquidating value shows in cell F-2

Screenshot_448

Hedged strategies with a higher return on risk

8)   March 2016 100
9)   March 2016 25
10) March 2016 10
11) March 2016 5

If you’d like me to review this and other strategies for trading global rates higher through 2018 contact me.

Major events on deck that will generate major market moves across the board

12)  Click here China’s currency the Renminbi joins the world’s reserve currencies October 2015

13) Click here The U.S. can no longer service 18 trillion in debt with only 1.8 trillion in annual tax receipts, the current national debt to tax receipt ratio is unsustainable and now irreversible.

With China’s currency the Renminbi on deck to become a world reserve currency in October 2015 I believe will see major market moves in currencies that could rival 2008 below are several programs to capture these moves.

14) Our Structure

Fees
Front load = 0.00%
Management fee 0.00%
Inventive Fee = 10.00% of net new high profits quarterly

To open a test account enabling you to get comfortable with our team

15) Direct FX opening instructions
16) Clearing and Exchange Members for larger accounts

17) The world’s largest dollar volume exchange group
18) CME videos
19) Due Diligence and how funds are protected
20) Commodity Futures Trading Commission

If you have questions or would like additional information please call
with this page available.

x

Click here for contact details

 

———————————————————————————————————————————–

RISK DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Program availability is dependent on your country of residency; assets, experience and net worth please contact us for details.

PAST RESULTS ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. EXAMPLES OF HISTORIC PRICE MOVES OR EXTREME MARKET CONDITIONS ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY THAT SUCH MOVES OR CONDITIONS ARE COMMON OCCURRENCES OR ARE LIKELY TO OCCUR.

HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM. ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT.

IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADE PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF THE HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.

BID/ASK SPREADS, BROKERAGE COMMISSION, CLEARING, EXCHANGE AND REGULATORY FEES WILL HAVE AN ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE NET OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF YOUR ACCOUNT. PRIOR TO MAKING A DECISION TO PARTICIPATE IN ANY INVESTMENT MAKE SURE YOU FULLY UNDERSTAND THE FEES ASSOCIATED WITH TRADING.

THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT CONTAINS RESEARCH, MARKET COMMENTARY AND TRADE RECOMMENDATIONS. YOU MAY BE SOLICITED FOR AN ACCOUNT BY PRIMARY ASSETS MANAGEMENT OR ONE OF ITS REPRESENTATIVES OR EMPLOYEES. IT SHOULD BE KNOWN THAT THE REPRESENTATIVES OF PRIMARY ASSETS MANAGEMENT MAY TRADE FUTURES AND OPTIONS FOR THEIR OWN ACCOUNTS OR THOSE OF OTHERS. DUE TO VARIOUS FACTORS (SUCH AS MARGIN REQUIREMENTS, RISK FACTORS, TRADING OBJECTIVES, TRADING INSTRUCTIONS, TRADING STRATEGIES, AND OTHER FACTORS) SUCH TRADING MAY RESULT IN THE LIQUIDATION OR INITIATION OF FUTURES OR OPTIONS POSITIONS THAT DIFFER FROM THE OPINIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOUND IN THIS REPORT.

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE PERFORMANCE. THE RISK OF LOSS IN TRADING FUTURES CONTRACTS OR COMMODITY OPTIONS CAN BE SUBSTANTIAL, AND THEREFORE INVESTORS SHOULD UNDERSTAND THE RISKS INVOLVED IN TAKING LEVERAGED POSITIONS AND MUST ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH SUCH INVESTMENTS AND FOR THEIR RESULTS.

YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER WHETHER SUCH TRADING IS SUITABLE FOR YOU IN LIGHT OF YOUR CIRCUMSTANCES AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES. YOU SHOULD READ THE “RISK DISCLOSURE” WEBPAGE ACCESSED AT THE TOP OF THE HOMEPAGE. PRIMARY ASSETS MANAGEMENT IS NOT AFFILIATED WITH NOR DOES IT ENDORSE ANY TRADING SYSTEM, NEWSLETTER OR OTHER SIMILAR SERVICE.

 

China by the numbers & world currency status –

Banks calling for a new world reserve currency
IMF/World Bank news
China & the IMF

U.S. versus China’s growth, U.S. in blue, China in red

1) Click here for a current Fed chart

Screenshot_411

U.S. Trade surplus or deficit

2) Click here for a current chart

Screenshot_413

China trade surplus or deficit

3) Click here for a current chart

Screenshot_415

U.S. versus China’s debt to Gross Domestic Product  (GDP)

4) Click here for a current chart

Screenshot_416

U.S. versus China’s interest rates

5) Click here for a current chart

Screenshot_417

Some 95 per cent of all global foreign exchange reserves are invested in just four currencies: the US dollar, the euro, the yen and sterling. The central banks of the ‘Big Four’ are all expanding their balance sheets or have been doing so for years with no sign of immediate reversal. They are all trying to convert huge debt problems into inflation problems, and when they succeed their currencies will weaken sharply.

In this currency war, EM central banks risk suffering the most collateral damage. Their reserves – so many of them held in the big four currencies – will be decimated in purchasing power terms. The world will become desperate for alternative currencies to act as replacements for the traditional reserve currencies once their currency debasement efforts really take root.

So far, only one country, China, appears to have spotted the opportunities presented by this situation. Most others merely watch the dollar in fear.

China’s renminbi will become a global reserve currency in the not too distant future. China will benefit enormously from becoming a global reserve currency – not only will its currency become far more stable, but China will also no longer need so many reserves. The excess reserves can then be used for sovereign wealth fund purposes, including the AIIB. Finally, China will be able to increase consumption, because it no longer needs to suppress domestic demand in order to maintain high levels of reserves.

But the world will need more new reserve currencies than just the renminbi. This means that other large EM countries such as Mexico, Brazil, India and others could also benefit from the opportunity that China is now exploiting. With sensible planning and prudent policy implementation, they too can become global reserve currencies.

Technocrats in EM central banks are aware of these issues but face tremendous challenges in convincing their boards of the need to diversify into other currencies. That is why China’s move is so important. The renminbi’s ascent to reserve currency status will demonstrate the huge benefits of diversifying away from the ‘Big Four’ currencies. China will soon have to sell treasuries as its reserves become true ‘excess’ reserves. It is likely to seek to invest the cash in less mainstream currencies. Other EM central banks will ultimately reciprocate by buying renminbi. As each major EM central bank diversifies, not only will it be good for other EM currencies, it will also help all of them to reduce their excess exposures to the ‘Big Four’ QE currencies.


In preparation of the Renminbi becoming a World Reserve Currency the World’s largest dollar volume exchange group has listed Renminbi futures against both the USD and Euro.

10) Offshore Chinese Renminbi Market CME report

Screenshot_418

Renminbi Versus the USD

11) Chinese Renminbi/USD Futures
12) Chinese Renminbi/USD Quotes

Renminbi Versus the Euro 

13) Chinese Renminbi/Euro Futures
14) Chinese Renminbi/Euro quotes

15) Our Structure

Front load = 0.00%
Management fee 0.00%
Incentive fee = 10.00% of net new high profits quarterly

To open a test account enabling you to get comfortable with our team

16) Direct FX opening instructions
17) Clearing and Exchange Members for larger accounts
18) The world’s largest dollar volume exchange group
19) CME videos
20) Due Diligence and how funds are protected
21) Commodity Futures Trading Commission

If you have questions or would like additional information please call
with this page available.

x

Click here for contact details

 

 ————————————————————————————————————————————————–

 

RISK DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Program availability is dependent on your country of residency; assets, experience and net worth please contact us for details.

PAST RESULTS ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. EXAMPLES OF HISTORIC PRICE MOVES OR EXTREME MARKET CONDITIONS ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY THAT SUCH MOVES OR CONDITIONS ARE COMMON OCCURRENCES OR ARE LIKELY TO OCCUR.

HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM. ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT.

IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADE PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF THE HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.

BID/ASK SPREADS, BROKERAGE COMMISSION, CLEARING, EXCHANGE AND REGULATORY FEES WILL HAVE AN ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE NET OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF YOUR ACCOUNT. PRIOR TO MAKING A DECISION TO PARTICIPATE IN ANY INVESTMENT MAKE SURE YOU FULLY UNDERSTAND THE FEES ASSOCIATED WITH TRADING.

THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT CONTAINS RESEARCH, MARKET COMMENTARY AND TRADE RECOMMENDATIONS. YOU MAY BE SOLICITED FOR AN ACCOUNT BY PRIMARY ASSETS MANAGEMENT OR ONE OF ITS REPRESENTATIVES OR EMPLOYEES. IT SHOULD BE KNOWN THAT THE REPRESENTATIVES OF PRIMARY ASSETS MANAGEMENT MAY TRADE FUTURES AND OPTIONS FOR THEIR OWN ACCOUNTS OR THOSE OF OTHERS. DUE TO VARIOUS FACTORS (SUCH AS MARGIN REQUIREMENTS, RISK FACTORS, TRADING OBJECTIVES, TRADING INSTRUCTIONS, TRADING STRATEGIES, AND OTHER FACTORS) SUCH TRADING MAY RESULT IN THE LIQUIDATION OR INITIATION OF FUTURES OR OPTIONS POSITIONS THAT DIFFER FROM THE OPINIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOUND IN THIS REPORT.

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE PERFORMANCE. THE RISK OF LOSS IN TRADING FUTURES CONTRACTS OR COMMODITY OPTIONS CAN BE SUBSTANTIAL, AND THEREFORE INVESTORS SHOULD UNDERSTAND THE RISKS INVOLVED IN TAKING LEVERAGED POSITIONS AND MUST ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH SUCH INVESTMENTS AND FOR THEIR RESULTS.

YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER WHETHER SUCH TRADING IS SUITABLE FOR YOU IN LIGHT OF YOUR CIRCUMSTANCES AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES. YOU SHOULD READ THE “RISK DISCLOSURE” WEBPAGE ACCESSED AT THE TOP OF THE HOMEPAGE. PRIMARY ASSETS MANAGEMENT IS NOT AFFILIATED WITH NOR DOES IT ENDORSE ANY TRADING SYSTEM, NEWSLETTER OR OTHER SIMILAR SERVICE.

A Better Way to Trade Using Defined Risk Strategies

Contact us for an update on this or any trading strategy

The objective of this trading program is to participate in trends while defining risk on each trade and for the duration of every trading period.

Performance dates

2, January 1998 through  30, April 2015.
Net profit per $50,000 trading unit = +$422,641
Greatest net drawdown  =
-$10,480

Performance is based on trading one unit and deducting the net profits annually. Clearing and execution vary from firm to firm below I’m allowing 8 pips per round turn trade for bid/ask spreads and any potential order execution slippage.

Screenshot_300
Risk disclosure

2) Strategy

Let’s start by looking at the Eurodollar FX chart below is it really that hard to define the overall trend for this market during the last 12 months and the current reversal?

Click here to enlarge the chart below
Click here for a current chart

Screenshot_285

Once the trend is identified we employ strategies that define risk on every trade and for the duration of every trading period without wasting inordinate amounts of precious investment capital on purchasing option time premium.

3) Methods used

A) Option collars
B) Writing at the money, buying out of the money options against the trend
C) Writing deep in the money, buying out of the money options with the trend

4) Option collars

A) Establish you position with the trend in this example we’re long
B) B
uy an out of the money put to define risk
C) Write an out of the money call collecting premium to pay for the put

If the trend continues the long position will be called away at a profit
If the trend reverses the risk is defined by the purchased put
If the market stays the same you have not wasted money on time premium.

Click here to enlarge the chart below
Click here for a current chart

Screenshot_293

5) Collar Definition

Establishing a collar to protect a long position involves purchasing puts for downside insurance, while at the same time selling calls, with the premium taken to finance the cost of the puts.

The purchased puts will have a strike price the same or less than that of the calls sold, and very commonly both options are out-of-the-money when the position is established. The short calls will limit upside profit potential of the position for the duration of the option.

Collars can always be liquidated to lock in profits and then reestablished at the current level allowing additional gains while defining risk.

The degree to which the collar’s protective puts are paid for by the premium received from the written calls depends entirely on the current level of the underlying currency, the strike prices and premium amounts of the contracts chosen. It is possible to construct a collar so that not only are the puts fully paid for by the call premium, but that the call premium actually exceeds the puts’ cost. In other words the whole position may established at a net credit, which the collar investor keeps whether the level of the underlying currency increases, decreases or remains unchanged.

6) Benefits of using a “Collar”

A) The position cannot be stopped out regardless of market volatility
B) If you are correct in identifying the trend the trade will be profitable
C) Risk is objectively defined on the trade and for the duration of the trading period (expiration)
E) Collar’s can be lifted any time locking in gains and reestablished to capture more of the move
F) Trade frequency is defined for the duration of the trading period (expiration)
G) The only way the position can be called away is at a profit
H) If the market stays the same the call premium collected covers most if not all the put premium paid

7) Writing at the money options buying out of the money options against the trend creating a credit. In this example we’re anticipating the market moving higher. 

A) Write an at the money put collecting ” fat option time premium” .

B) Using a portion of the collected premium buy an out of the money put to define risk.

C) If the market continues its uptrend both puts will expire worthless generating a net credit for the account.

D) If the market reverses risk is defined by the purchased put with the loss being in part offset by the differences in option premium. 

Click here to enlarge this chart
Click here for a current chart

Defined

In options trading, an option spread is created by the simultaneous purchase and sale of options of the same currency but with different strike prices.

Any spread that is constructed using calls can be referred to as a call spread. Similarly, put spreads are spreads created using put options.

Option buyers can use spreads to define risk and profit on any trade and for the duration of the trading period.

Using this strategy premiums received from the short leg(s) of the spread are greater than the premiums paid for the long leg(s), resulting in funds being credited into the option trader’s account when the position is entered.

The net credit received is also the maximum profit attainable when implementing this spread strategy.

Benefits

A) The position cannot be stopped out regardless of market volatility
B) If  you identify the trend correctly the position will be profitable
C) Risk is objectively defined on the trade and for the duration of the trading period (expiration)
D) The spread can be lifted at any time to lock in gains and reestablished with defined risk
E) Trade frequency is defined for the duration of the trading period (expiration)
F) If the market stays the same with the trend continuing the premium collected generates a net credit to the account.

8) Writing deep in the money options buying out of the money options with the trend, in the example below the short term trend is higher.

A) Write an in the money put collecting “in the money” and “time premium

B) Using a portion of the collected premium purchase an out of the money put to define risk

C) If the trend continues both puts will expire creating a net credit for the account, If the market reverses the loss will be contained by the purchased put.

Click here to enlarge the chart below
Click here for a current chart

Screenshot_2976

Defined

Long; we write a deep in the money put option collecting “in the money” and “time value”  then purchase an out out the money put with a portion of the money collected from the write to define risk with the expectation that the market will move higher and both options will expire worthless. Should the market move substantially lower the risk will be limited by the purchased “out of the money” put and risk is objectively defined on this trade and for the duration of the trading period (expiration)

Short; we write a deep in the money call option collecting “in the money” and “time value” then purchase an out of the money call to define risk with the expectation that the market will move lower and both call options will expire worthless creating a net credit. Should the market move substantially higher the risk is objectively defined by the purchased “out of the money”  call on the trade and for the duration of the trading period.

Benefits

A) The position cannot be stopped out regardless of market volatility
B) Risk is objectively defined on the trade and for the duration of the trading period (expiration)
C) The spread can be lifted at any time to lock in gains and reestablished with defined risk
D) Trade frequency is defined for the duration of the trading period (expiration)
E) If the market stays the same with the trend continuing the premium collected generates a net credit to the account.

Fees

Front load = 0.00%
Management fee = 0.00% to 2.00% annually dependent on account size
Incentive fee = 10% to 20% of net new high profits quarterly
Recommended minimum = $50,000 or equivalent major currency,
Minimum $25,000 in
actual funds $25,000 notional funds.
Positions and liquidation value are available online at anytime.
Accounts can be funded and maintained in any major currency
Liquidity in portion or all 2-48 hours in any major currency.

Click here to open an account

If you have any questions or need additional information contract us

——————————————————————————————————————————————

RISK DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

PAST RESULTS ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. EXAMPLES OF HISTORIC PRICE MOVES OR EXTREME MARKET CONDITIONS ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY THAT SUCH MOVES OR CONDITIONS ARE COMMON OCCURRENCES OR ARE LIKELY TO OCCUR.

HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM. ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT.

IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADE PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF THE HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.

BID/ASK SPREADS, BROKERAGE COMMISSION, CLEARING, EXCHANGE AND REGULATORY FEES WILL HAVE AN ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE NET OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF YOUR ACCOUNT. PRIOR TO MAKING A DECISION TO PARTICIPATE IN ANY INVESTMENT MAKE SURE YOU FULLY UNDERSTAND THE FEES ASSOCIATED WITH TRADING.

THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT CONTAINS RESEARCH, MARKET COMMENTARY AND TRADE RECOMMENDATIONS. YOU MAY BE SOLICITED FOR AN ACCOUNT BY ONE OF OUR REPRESENTATIVES OR EMPLOYEES. IT SHOULD BE KNOWN THAT THE REPRESENTATIVES OF OUR FIRM MAY TRADE FUTURES AND OPTIONS FOR THEIR OWN ACCOUNTS OR THOSE OF OTHERS. DUE TO VARIOUS FACTORS (SUCH AS MARGIN REQUIREMENTS, RISK FACTORS, TRADING OBJECTIVES, TRADING INSTRUCTIONS, TRADING STRATEGIES, AND OTHER FACTORS) SUCH TRADING MAY RESULT IN THE LIQUIDATION OR INITIATION OF FUTURES OR OPTIONS POSITIONS THAT DIFFER FROM THE OPINIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOUND IN THIS REPORT.

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE PERFORMANCE. THE RISK OF LOSS IN TRADING FUTURES CONTRACTS OR COMMODITY OPTIONS CAN BE SUBSTANTIAL, AND THEREFORE INVESTORS SHOULD UNDERSTAND THE RISKS INVOLVED IN TAKING LEVERAGED POSITIONS AND MUST ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH SUCH INVESTMENTS AND FOR THEIR RESULTS.

YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER WHETHER SUCH TRADING IS SUITABLE FOR YOU IN LIGHT OF YOUR CIRCUMSTANCES AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES

Contact

My current date/time May 13, 2026 3:09 pm
Hours 7am-7pm Mon. – Thu. 7am – 2pm Fri.
Off hours text, email or message me

Peter Knight
Direct +1 340*244*4310


Zoom Peter Knight Advisor (my direct video chat link)

How to join a Zoom meeting without a Zoom account

Message me
Goto VOIP & video chats
GoTo VOIP number +1 312 450 0609
Email: Peter_Knight@PeterKnightAdvisor.com

Address
Little Mountain Road,

Tortola
British Virgin Islands VG1110
BVI Location Google Map

18° 24′ 0″ N / 64° 36′ 0″ W

2) Quick links

Educational  Analysis & Performance  Accounts
Exchanges Traded ATA Performance Brokerage Firms
Research Reports Performance by Market Safety of Funds
Educational Videos Create Your Own Allocation Defining Account Risk
Video Archive Hybrid Performance  Fee Structure
Courses Charts & Quotes Open an Account

3) Frequently Asked Questions About the British Virgin Islands

Airport
Marinas
Corporate Law
Corporation Formation
Taxation
Real Estate Prices

4) Aerial of the Islands

5) Landing at Beef Island, British Virgin Islands, final approach

____________________________________________________________________

Disclosure